Agile Software Development

Essential SAFe and the Agile End Game

Posted on Updated on

essential-safebigpicture
Essential SAFe 4.0, Scaled Agile, Inc.

The good folks at Scaled Agile, the SAFe® community, Agile agnostics, consultants, and some in the “Agile” community are onto something incredibly important in defining the elusive and dynamic Agile End Game for organizations. Read the rest of this entry »

The Cynefin Framework reference

Aside Posted on Updated on

cynefin_framework_by_edwin_stoop
Sketch of the Cynefin framework, by Edwin Stoop

I can’t say that I agree at all with Dave Snowden’s approach to communication. The guy is rough around the edges, a “perpetual curmudgeon” in his own words. And that is describing it kindly. He does have some good ideas on decision making though. Read the rest of this entry »

SAFe 4.0 Scrum master with SSM Certification (2 day course) Dallas, TX

Link Posted on Updated on

bls_dallastxsafescrummasterwssm_v1

DESCRIPTION

In this two-day course, you’ll gain an understanding of the role of Scrum Master in the Scaled Agile Framework for the enterprise (SAFe). Read the rest of this entry »

SAFe 4.0 Scrum master with SSM Certification (2 day course) Oklahoma City, OK

Link Posted on Updated on

bls_okcsafescrummasterwssm_v2
DESCRIPTION
In this two-day course (March 30-31, 2017), you’ll gain an understanding of the role of Scrum Master in the Scaled Agile Framework for the enterprise (SAFe). Read the rest of this entry »

Truths about the SAFe

Posted on Updated on

mikebeedleagilemanifesto

S_Fe is not Agile. S_Fe is not even Scrum. – Mike Beedle

In response to Mike Beedle on LinkedIn. Mike is wrong about the SAFe of course. And not just because of his childish method of attack. Facts, evidence, experiments, my experience and dozens of business case studies back up the experiments of the SAFe. Mike sounds a lot like project managers that swear the PMBoK/waterfall works better than agile for large scale “projects” with high complexity, significant uncertainty, many dependencies and new knowledge to be obtained to deliver the product. Project management works in those scenarios (fantasy). But not as well as Agile (reality). Read the studies (Chaos Report, Standish Group; State of Agile, VersionOne; others). A sea change is in play — right now. Customers want predictability, results — and truth. Not endless “Change Requests” and contract modifications for more time, more money and more people. One truth about the Agile Manifesto is that it is great guidance as a value system and principles for software development. The big problem is that it [Agile Manifesto] is STATIC. Relentless improvement drives us to go beyond yesterday. Study the Scaled Agile Framework for the enterprise and come to your own conclusions. Evolve or join the museum with the other artifacts of the information age.

Responses below.

Read the rest of this entry »

SAFe Scrum master with SSM certification

Posted on Updated on

A new SAFe Scrum master course was announced for Oklahoma!

certmarkssmmedium150px

 

Lippitt/Knoster Change Model – useful dive into change theory

Posted on Updated on

Studying up on Lippitt / Knoster change models I learned about from Construx videos. Steve McConnell of course being one of the greatest software development thought leaders is the presenter. Interesting how these change theories are baked into some of the Agile frameworks and mindsets like the SAFe / Agile Manifesto. As a coach, these are useful strategies on how to build our approach to managing change (like fear, unknowns, budgeting/money, et cetera).

Get a Grip on Managing Change – Michael Nanfito

Agile Transformations – Change Model – Construx